Abstract
Lately, remote education has been more popular. However, there hasn't been a legitimate outcome for academic exams. Several institutions have mandated remote proctoring, where an invigilator proctor continuously monitors student performance, while others have collected assignments that students can copy and paste from the internet, where an invigilator proctor keeps watching pupil conditioning. There must be a solution if the way we live is to become the new norm. We have proposed a methodology in this research to formulate a comprehensive system that is AI-based and can help avoid exam cheating. The system monitors for fraudulent activity and records the proof. This technology will be both affordable and secure.
References
Miller, A., Shoptaugh, C. & Wooldridge, J. (2011) “Reasons Not to Cheat, Academicintegrity Responsibility, and Frequency of Cheating”, The Journal of Experimental Education, Vol 79, pp 69-184.
Nath, L & Lovaglia, M. (2009). “Cheating on Multiple Choice Exams: Monitoring, Assessment, and an Optional Assignment”, College Teaching Vol 57, No. 1, pp 3-8
Mirza, N. & Staples, E. (2010) “Webcam as a New Invigilation Method: Students’ Comfort and Potential for Cheating”, Journal of Nursing Education, Vol 49, No. 2, pp 116119.
Rowe, N.C (2004) “Cheating in Online Student Assessment: Beyond Plagiarism”, Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, Vol 7, No. 2
Wise, S.L. & Plake, B.S. (1989). Research on the effects of administering tests via computers. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 8(3), 5-10.
Stuber-McEwen D. Wiseley P. Hoggatt, S. (2009) “Point, Click, and Cheat: Frequency and Type of Academic Dishonesty in the Virtual Classroom”, Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, Vol 12, No. 2
Styron, J. & Styron, R.A. (2010) “Student Cheating and Alternative Web-based Assessment”, Journal of College Teaching & Learning Vol 7, No. 5, pp 37-42
WCET (2009). Best practice strategies to promote academic integrity in online education. WCET, UT TeleCampus, and Instructional Technology Council. Retrieved from http://wcet.wiche.edu/sites/default/files/docs/resources/Best-Practices-Promote-AcademicIntegrity-2009.pdf, Vol 7, No 5
Mideth B Abisado, Ramon L. Rodriguez , Antero Rosauro Arias , Cheryl Mari Isip , James Darryl Bungay, John Mark Cipriano , Larry A Vea - Modeling Filipino Academic Affect during Online Examination using Machine Learning, Vol 2, No 7
Watson G. Sottile, J. (2010) “Cheating in the Digital age: Do Students Cheat More in Online Courses?”,Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, Vol 13, No 1
Alessio, H. M., Malay, N., Maurer, K., John Bailer, A., & Rubin, B. (2017). Examining the Effect of Proctoring on Online Test Scores, Vol 7, No 5
Atoum Y, Chen L, Liu AX, Hsu SDH, Liu X. Automated Online Exam Proctoring. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia. 2017;19(7):1609–1624. doi: 10.1109/TMM.2017.2656064, Vol 4, No 1