Assessment of Environmental and Energy Performance Criteria for Street Lighting Tenders using Decision Support System
PDF
PDF

How to Cite

Sathesh, A. 2020. “Assessment of Environmental and Energy Performance Criteria for Street Lighting Tenders Using Decision Support System”. Journal of Electronics and Informatics 2 (2): 72-79. https://doi.org/10.36548/jei.2020.2.001.

Keywords

— Sustainability
— Street lighting
— Lighting tender
— Lighting pollution
— LED luminaries
— Environmental criteria
— Energy efficiency
— Energy indicators
— Decision tool
— Adaptive lighting
Published: 01-06-2020

Abstract

Ineffective policies, missing technical information, large volumes of inappropriate luminaires, malpractice and several such reasons act as a hinderance for the adoption of LEDs in road lighting design despite being the most efficient sources of light. In national roads, the decision makers are sometimes confused by the low efficacy values of the luminaires. The tools for lighting simulation and projects in street lights require several energy performance indicators as described in EN13201-5 which is a novel system. This paper presents an optimal evaluation technique that involves the environmental criteria and can be implemented in the future energy policy. Evaluation of lighting tender and lighting designs is performed using a decision tool while analysing the significance of these factors. The corresponding offers and their ranking is evaluated by the decision tool. Several environmental benefits as well as improved energy saving can be achieved on implementation of this system. Simulation results shows reduced emission of CO2 and 75% energy saving using the best solution

References

  1. Polzin, F., von Flotow, P., & Nolden, C. (2016). Modes of governance for municipal energy efficiency services–The case of LED street lighting in Germany. Journal of cleaner production, 139, 133-145.
  2. Power, D. J., & Sharda, R. (2007). Model-driven decision support systems: Concepts and research directions. Decision Support Systems, 43(3), 1044-1061.
  3. Bertoldi, P., & Boza-Kiss, B. (2017). Analysis of barriers and drivers for the development of the ESCO markets in Europe. Energy Policy, 107, 345-355.
  4. Pohekar, S. D., & Ramachandran, M. (2004). Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning—A review. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 8(4), 365-381.
  5. Beerepoot, M., & Beerepoot, N. (2007). Government regulation as an impetus for innovation: Evidence from energy performance regulation in the Dutch residential building sector. Energy Policy, 35(10), 4812-4825.
  6. Marino, A., Bertoldi, P., Rezessy, S., & Boza-Kiss, B. (2011). A snapshot of the European energy service market in 2010 and policy recommendations to foster a further market development. Energy Policy, 39(10), 6190-6198.
  7. Anthopoulou, E., & Doulos, L. (2019, September). The effect of the continuous energy efficient upgrading of LED street lighting technology: The case study of Egnatia Odos. In 2019 Second Balkan Junior Conference on Lighting (Balkan Light Junior) (pp. 1-2). IEEE.
  8. Eom, S., & Kim, E. (2006). A survey of decision support system applications (1995–2001). Journal of the Operational Research Society, 57(11), 1264-1278.
  9. Hermoso-Orzáez, M. J., Lozano-Miralles, J. A., Lopez-Garcia, R., & Brito, P. (2019). Environmental Criteria for Assessing the Competitiveness of Public Tenders with the Replacement of Large-Scale LEDs in the Outdoor Lighting of Cities as a Key Element for Sustainable Development: Case Study Applied with PROMETHEE Methodology. Sustainability, 11(21), 5982.
  10. Jägerbrand, A. K. (2020). Synergies and Trade-Offs Between Sustainable Development and Energy Performance of Exterior Lighting. Energies, 13(9), 2245.
  11. Wang, J. J., Jing, Y. Y., Zhang, C. F., & Zhao, J. H. (2009). Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 13(9), 2263-2278.
  12. Wong, J. K., & Li, H. (2008). Application of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in multi-criteria analysis of the selection of intelligent building systems. Building and Environment, 43(1), 108-125.
  13. Darney, P. E., & Jacob, I. J. (2019). Performance Enhancements of Cognitive Radio Networks Using The Improved Fuzzy Logic. Journal of Soft Computing Paradigm (JSCP), 1(02), 57-68.
  14. Bindhu, V. (2019). Green Cloud Computing Solution for Operational Cost Efficiency and Environmental Impact Reduction. Journal of ISMAC, 1(02), 120-128.