Journal of Ubiquitous Computing and Communication Technologies
IRO Journals
Volume 4 — Issue 2 — June 2022

Augmentation for Blood Doping Discovery in Sports using Random Forest Ensembles with LightGBM

https://doi.org/10.36548/jucct.2022.2.006
D. Sasikala
Professor, Department of CSE, JB Institute of Engineering & Technology, Moinabad, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
K. Venkatesh Sharma
Professor, Department of CSE, CVR College of Engineering, Vastu Nagar, Mangalpally, Hyderabad, Telangana,
PDF
PDF

How to Cite

Sasikala, D., and K. Venkatesh Sharma. 2022. “Augmentation for Blood Doping Discovery in Sports Using Random Forest Ensembles With LightGBM”. Journal of Ubiquitous Computing and Communication Technologies 4 (2): 115-24. https://doi.org/10.36548/jucct.2022.2.006.
ACM ACS APA ABNT Chicago Harvard IEEE MLA Turabian Vancouver AMA

Download Citation

Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX

Keywords

— Blood doping
— artificial intelligence
— drug abuse
— rhEPO
— wada
— sports
Published: 26-07-2022

Abstract

Athletics bureaucrats round the globe are tackling implausible encounters owing to the partial methods of customs executed by the athletes to progress their enactment in their sports. It embraces the intake of hormonal centred remedies or transfusion of blood to upsurge their power and the effect of their coaching. On the other hand, the up-to-date direct test of discovery of these circumstances embraces the laboratory-centred technique viz restricted for the reason that of the cost factors, handiness of medical experts, etc. This ends us to pursue for indirect assessments. By the emergent curiosity of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in healthcare, it is vital to put forward a process built on blood factors to advance decision making. In this research script, a statistical and machine learning (ML) centred tactic was suggested to ascertain the concern of doping constituent rhEPO in blood units.

References

  1. Galily, Y. (2018). Artificial intelligence and sports journalism: Is it a sweeping change? Technology in Society, 54, 47-51.
  2. Jelkmann, W. (2016). Features of Blood Doping. Deutsche Zeitschrift f¨ur Sportmedizin, 67, 255-262.
  3. WADA (2021). World Anti-Doping Code 2021, World Anti-Doping Agency.
  4. John, M. J., Jaison, V., Jain, K., Kakkar, N., and Jacob, J. J. (2012). Erythropoietin use and abuse, Indian journal of endocrinology and metabolism, 16(2), 220–227.
  5. Manfredini, F., Malagoni, A. M., Litmanen, H., Zhukovskaja, L., Jeannier, P., Follo, D., Felisatti, M., Besseberg, A., Geistlinger, M., Bayer, P. and Carrabre, J. (2011). Performance and blood monitoring in sports: The artificial intelligence evoking target testing in antidoping (AR.I.E.T.T.A.) project. J Sports Med Phys Fitness, 51(1):153-9.
  6. Bajla, I., Holl¨ander, I., Czedik-Heiss, D. and Granec, R. (2009). Classification of image objects in Epo doping control using fuzzy decision tree. Pattern Analysis and Applications, 12(3):285-300.
  7. Kelly, T., Beharry, A. and Fedoruk, M (2019). Applying Machine Learning Techniques to Advance Anti-Doping. European Journal of Sports and Exercise Science, 7:2.
  8. Sottas, P.-E., Robinson, N., Giraud, S, Taroni, F., Kamber, M., Mangin, P. and Saugy, M. (2006). Statistical Classification of Abnormal Blood Profiles in Athletes. The International Journal of Biostatistics, 2:1.
  9. Sch¨utz, F. and Zollinger, A. (2018). ABPS: An R Package for Calculating the Abnormal Blood Profile Score. Frontiers in Physiology, 9.
  10. Jelkmann, W. (2016). Erythropoietin. Front Horm Res, 47:115-27.
  11. Jelkmann, W. and Lundby, C. (2011). Blood doping and its detection, Blood, 118:9.
  12. Zorzoli, M. (2011). Biological passport parameters, Journal of Human Sports and Exercise, 6:2.
  13. Dimitrova, D.S., Kaishev, V.K. and Tan, S. (2020). Computing the Kolmogorov–Smirnov Distribution when the Underlying cdf is Purely Discrete, Mixed or Continuous. Journal of Statistical Software, 95 (10): 1–42.
  14. Hearst, M.A., Dumais, S.T., Osman, E., Platt, J. and Scholkopf, B. (1998). Support vector machines. IEEE Intelligent Systems and their Applications, 13, 18-28.
  15. Re, M. and Valentini, G. (2012). Ensemble methods: A review, Chapman and Hall, 563-594.
  16. B¨uhlmann, Peter (2012). Bagging, Boosting and Ensemble Methods, Handbook of Computational Statistics.
  17. Preiman, L. (2001), Random Forests. Machine Learning, 45, 5-32.
  18. Freund, Y. and Schapire, R.E. (1996), Experiments with a new boosting algorithm. ICML, 148-156.
  19. Chen, T. and Guestrin, C. (2016). XGBoost: Scalable Tree Boosting System, arXiv:1603.02754.
  20. Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., Blondel, M., Prettenhofer, P., Weiss, R., Dubourg, V., Vanderplas, J., Passos, A., Cournapeau, D., Brucher, M., Perrot, M. and Duchesnay, E. (2011). Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python, Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12:2825-2830.
  21. Akiba, T., Sano, S., Yanase, T., Ohta, T. and Koyama, M. (2019). Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Framework. Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining.
  22. Hossin, M. and Sulaiman, M.N. (2015). A Review on Evaluation Metrics for Data Classification Evaluations. International Journal of Data Mining and Knowledge Management Process, 5:01-11.