An Accurate Bitcoin Price Prediction using logistic regression with LSTM Machine Learning model
Volume-3 | Issue-3
Design of Distribution Transformer Health Management System using IoT Sensors
Volume-3 | Issue-3
Energy Management System in the Vehicles using Three Level Neuro Fuzzy Logic
Volume-3 | Issue-3
Cloud Load Estimation with Deep Logarithmic Network for Workload and Time Series Optimization
Volume-3 | Issue-3
Design of a Food Recommendation System using ADNet algorithm on a Hybrid Data Mining Process
Volume-3 | Issue-4
Nepali Image Captioning: Generating Coherent Paragraph-Length Descriptions Using Transformer
Volume-6 | Issue-1
Review on Data Securing Techniques for Internet of Medical Things
Volume-3 | Issue-3
Automatic Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease using Hybrid Model and CNN
Volume-3 | Issue-4
Population Based Meta Heuristics Algorithm for Performance Improvement of Feed Forward Neural Network
Volume-2 | Issue-1
Comparative Analysis of an Efficient Image Denoising Method for Wireless Multimedia Sensor Network Images in Transform Domain
Volume-3 | Issue-3
An Integrated Approach for Crop Production Analysis from Geographic Information System Data using SqueezeNet
Volume-3 | Issue-4
An Accurate Bitcoin Price Prediction using logistic regression with LSTM Machine Learning model
Volume-3 | Issue-3
Design of Distribution Transformer Health Management System using IoT Sensors
Volume-3 | Issue-3
Design of a Food Recommendation System using ADNet algorithm on a Hybrid Data Mining Process
Volume-3 | Issue-4
Automatic Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease using Hybrid Model and CNN
Volume-3 | Issue-4
Effective Prediction of Online Reviews for Improvement of Customer Recommendation Services by Hybrid Classification Approach
Volume-3 | Issue-4
Acoustic Features Based Emotional Speech Signal Categorization by Advanced Linear Discriminator Analysis
Volume-3 | Issue-4
Analysis of Statistical Trends of Future Air Pollutants for Accurate Prediction
Volume-3 | Issue-4
Identification of Electricity Threat and Performance Analysis using LSTM and RUSBoost Methodology
Volume-3 | Issue-4
Review on Data Securing Techniques for Internet of Medical Things
Volume-3 | Issue-3
Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement
As an independent publisher, IRO Journals is committed to upholding the highest standards of ethical research and publication practices. This statement is based on the guidelines developed by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) https://publicationethics.org/
IRO Journals takes all allegations of scientific misconduct, fraudulent publication, or plagiarism very seriously. In such cases, we will work closely with the editors-in-chief to thoroughly investigate the situation. Based on the findings, we will take appropriate actions to rectify the issue, including:
- Prompt publication of an erratum to clarify any errors or inconsistencies.
- Retraction of the entire article in severe cases of misconduct.
IRO Journals is dedicated to create a fair and inclusive environment for all researchers. We do not encourage discrimination based on factors such as age, race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or disability in our publication processes.
The final decision regarding manuscript acceptance or rejection are made by the editors. Authors who wish to appeal an editorial decision can directly contact the journal. For complaints concerning co-authors, reviewers, or editorial board members, please reach out to the Editor-in-Chief.
IRO Journals strives for transparency throughout the editorial process. Authors will receive clear and timely communication regarding the status of their submissions. We also encourage open communication and collaboration among researchers, editors, and reviewers.
We are committed to continuously reviewing and updating our publication ethics policies to ensure we adhere to the highest standards and best practices in academic publishing.
Post-Publication Retractions and Corrections
IRO Journals is committed to publishing accurate and reliable research. This policy ensures that errors are addressed promptly and transparently, maintaining the integrity of the scientific record.
Authors are responsible for promptly notifying the journal editor or publisher of any significant errors or inaccuracies discovered in their published work. They should cooperate with the editor to determine the appropriate course of action, which may involve retraction or correction.
If authors (or) readers identify incorrect data or other errors in a published manuscript, they should contact the journal editor or publisher at journals@iroglobal.com.
Common reasons for corrections include prominent errors in data, figures, or authorship changes.
In case of corrections, Editors will consult the COPE post-publication critique https://publicationethics.org/
Retraction of a published manuscript is a serious but necessary step in cases of severe misconduct, such as:
- Manipulation of research data or figures.
- Failure to obtain copyright permission for reused material.
- Unreproducible data.
- Unethical research, review, or publishing practices.
We strongly condemn the creation and use of fabricated data and rigorously screen manuscripts, if any such arise post-publication, the article will be retracted by following the the COPE flowchart on fabricated data in a published article https://publicationethics.org/
IRO Journals follows COPE's retraction guidelines https://publicationethics.org
The process involves:
- Initial Investigation: The journal's editor investigates the complaint.
- Editorial Discussion: The editor discusses the findings with the publisher to determine if retraction is warranted.
- Author Communication: All authors are notified of the concern, and transparent communication is maintained throughout the investigation.
- Retraction Notice: If retraction is necessary, a formal retraction notice will be published, clearly stating the reason for retraction.
Peer Review Policy
The peer review process of the journal is committed to ensuring that the journal publishes only high-quality, original, and ethically sound research manuscripts, adhering to the principles outlined in COPE's Core Practices https://publicationethics.org/core-practices.
The following processes are adopted in the peer-review process of the journal:
All submitted manuscripts undergo an initial evaluation to assess their relevance to the journal's scope, originality of research question, soundness of methodology, and clarity of writing. Manuscripts that do not meet these criteria may be rejected at this stage. All submitted manuscripts will be checked for plagiarism using the CrossCheck ithenticate tool. The articles that are selected form this stage will be further processed and passed on to at least 3 expert reviewers from the same domain.
IRO journals employ a double-blind peer review process, where reviewers' identities are concealed from the authors and vice versa. Reviewers are selected based on their expertise in the relevant field and potential conflicts of interest are declared and managed according to COPE's guidelines https://publicationethics.org/files/Peer%20review%20guidelines.pdf. Authors can expect feedback on the novelty, methodology, results, and overall quality of their manuscript.
IRO Journals is committed to ensuring a fair and unbiased peer review process. IRO Journals continuously monitors its review process to ensure adherence to ethical standards and best practices. This includes monitoring reviewer performance and maintaining a reviewer database that considers potential conflicts of interest. We take several steps to mitigate potential conflicts and biases:
- When authors suggest reviewers, editors carefully assess potential conflicts of interest. This includes ensuring reviewers are not from the same institution, laboratory, or have close personal or professional connections with the authors. Author affiliations are also scrutinized to identify discrepancies, such as mismatched institutional email addresses.
- If authors suggest reviewers with whom they might have connections, those reviewers will be disqualified. Similarly, if a manuscript's topic suggests potential bias, reviewers will be selected from different research areas.
- Potential reviewers are requested to disclose any conflicts or biases before accepting a review assignment.
- If conflicts arise or are undisclosed, IRO Journals follows the COPE flowchart guidelines https://publicationethics.org
/sites/ for handling such situations.default/files/ conflict-of-interest- submitted-manuscript -article-cope- flowchart.pdf - For published articles with undisclosed conflicts, we refer to the COPE flowchart for published articles https://publicationethics.org/
resources/flowcharts /what-do-if -reader-suspects -undisclosed-conflict -interest-coi- published-article
- Discovery of fraudulent peer review practices or author affiliation manipulation will result in the manuscript being rejected, with a clear explanation provided to the authors.
- Authors who suspect bias or conflicts affecting their manuscript's review can contact the Editor-in-Chief or editorial office to address their concerns and provide additional information.
- Authors are required to disclose any financial or other conflicts of interest that might influence their research findings or interpretations. This includes personal or professional relationships, funding sources (including grant numbers), and any other potential conflicts.
If author(s) or readers(s) suspect a conflict of interest in any published work from IRO Journals, please contact the journal's editor or the publisher at journals@iroglobal.com
Editorial Policy
IRO Journals publishes four issues per year, providing state-of-the-art research updates on emerging scientific and technical challenges in the digital era. We aim to support aspiring researchers by guiding them through the publication process, while adhering to the highest ethical standards. IRO Journals is committed to maintaining the integrity of the research record. Authors are expected to follow ethical research practices as outlined in COPE's Core Practices https://publicationethics.org
The final decision (accept, reject, revise) is made by the Editor-in-Chief, considering the reviewers' recommendations, the overall quality of the manuscript, and its alignment with the journal's aims and scope. This decision-making process adheres to the principles outlined in COPE's Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors https://publicationethics.org
IRO Journals maintain strict confidentiality of all submitted manuscripts and reviewer identities throughout the peer review process.
The final opinion of the Journal Editor will be sent along with the expert reviews and recommendations received. In any case, the Journal Editor will make the final decision on the acceptance and rejection of any submitted manuscript.
This section addresses reconsiderations of editorial decisions and appeals regarding publication ethics. All complaints and considerations are initially handled by the managing editors and editors responsible for submitted articles. Authors who wish to appeal an editorial decision are encouraged to consult COPE's guidelines on appeals to editors https://publicationethics.org
The Managing Editor or Editor-in-Chief (EiC) will consider appeals on review comments and rejection decisions. This may involve analyzing the appropriateness of the rejection statement or seeking additional reviewer opinions.
The Editor-in-Chief and Managing Editor will investigate appeals regarding article review times. Authors will receive a response with appropriate feedback, which will also be shared with the editors involved to improve submission handling procedures.
Complaints against managing editors can be directly communicated to the Editor-in-Chief or forwarded to [email address removed].
IRO Journals is committed to transparency in research data. Whenever possible, authors are encouraged to share the underlying data associated with their research, following the FAIR principles (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) https://www.goFAIR.org/. Data sharing allows for independent verification of research findings and facilitates further scientific progress.
The specific data sharing policies of IRO Journals may vary depending on the research scope and data type. However, authors should always be transparent about the data and tools used in their research. This may involve providing details about data collection methods, storage locations, and access restrictions.
Falsifying data or images, research findings, or reports constitutes a serious ethical breach, violating the core principles of research integrity.
Editors and reviewers who suspect fabricated data sets in a submitted manuscript should to the COPE flowchart on fabricated data in a submitted manuscript https://publicationethics.org
Authors are required to disclose all sources of funding, both financial and non-financial, that directly supported the research presented in their manuscript. This includes grants, contracts, equipment donations, or other forms of assistance. Transparency in funding helps readers understand potential conflicts of interest and assess the research's objectivity.
IRO Journals adheres to the high ethical standards outlined in the COPE Code of Conduct and Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors https://publicationethics.org
Open Access Policy
IRO journals provide a hybrid open access option that allows authors to publish openly in the preferred journal.
Once the submitted article is accepted, the corresponding author will get the option to select the open access option.
IRO Journals offer Hybrid Open-Access Options
- Gold Open Access
- Green Open Access
Green Open Access
|
Gold Open Access
|
The entire manuscript content will be published online and only the abstract will be freely available to anybody immediately upon publication. |
The entire manuscript content will be published online and freely available to anybody immediately upon publication. |
Options:
The published article will not be freely accessible. In this case, authors will be provided with a journal copy for non-promotional self-archiving purpose. |
Options:
The article will be freely available for access and the published PDF can be downloaded at any time from journal website |
License:
Article will be published under standard journal Copyright Transfer Agreement (CTA) |
License:
The article will be published under Open Access License Agreement with a Creative Commons License |
Article Processing Charge:
NIL |
Open Access Charges:
100 USD |
- High-Quality Publication Standards, where authors retain copyright with a Creative Commons license
- Visibility of article immediately upon publication will boost the credibility of your research work globally by increasing the number of citations.
- The final, published PDF of an author's article can be posted on a website, institutional repository, or other free public server.
- Articles will be automatically submitted to the journal’s indexing database: Crossref; Google Scholar; Microsoft Academic; ScienceGate; Dimensions; Worldcat; J-Gate
The author, institution, or funder pays an open access charge to make the article open access, making it freely available to everyone. The amount of the open access charge is as follows:
Open Access Publication Fee : USD 100
Payment Gateway:
proceed | |
proceed |
To know more about article processing procedures click here
Ethical Business Practices
All commercially funded publications and advertisements are distinct from editorial choices. Any product or service identified as an advertising or sponsored by a sponsor in IRO publications is not endorsed by IRO Journals. Commercial or financial interests, as well as any particular relationship with advertising clients or sponsors will not compromise the editorial content.
IRO journals retain the right to refuse any form of advertising that is detrimental to the IRO identity or is incompatible with the material available on the IRO publications network.
Once an advert has been published online, it can be removed from the journal's website at any time based on the requisition of Editor(s)-in-Chief or Publisher.
IRO Journals will not allow advertisements for contradictory items or services that are known to be hazardous for human population.
Advertisements must be verifiable and not deceptive or misleading. Advertisements should clearly identify the advertiser as well as the product or service being promoted. Copy that is exaggerated or extravagantly written will not be permitted.
IRO Journal will not permit any non-research related campaign to be targeted to a specific article(s) or on any page.
All advertisements for ICT research-specific campaigns must promote proper and reasonable usage and must not be deceptive.
Advertisements and editorial material must be distinguished properly. IRO journal does not publish “advertisement” content, and sponsored supplements must be explicitly labelled. If a supplement did not go through peer review or went through a different peer review procedure than the remainder of the journal, it should be mentioned explicitly.
Editorial choices will not be affected by existing or future sponsors and advertisers, nor will marketing decisions be impacted. Advertisers and sponsors have no control or influence over the results of keyword or search topic conducted by users on the website.
When you visit our website, we work with third-party advertising firms to show adverts and/or gather certain information. These companies may use cookies or web beacons to collect non-personally identifiable information [not including your name, address, email address, or telephone number] during your visit to this website in order to assist in displaying the advertisements on other websites that are also likely to be of interest to you.
Advertising Policy
- All commercially funded publications and advertisements are distinct from editorial choices. Any product or service identified as an advertising or sponsored by a sponsor in IRO publications is not endorsed by IRO Journals. Commercial or financial interests, as well as any particular relationship with advertising clients or sponsors will not compromise the editorial content.
- IRO journals retain the right to refuse any form of advertising that is detrimental to the IRO identity or is incompatible with the material available on the IRO publications network.
- Once an advert has been published online, it can be removed from the journal's website at any time based on the requisition of Editor(s)-in-Chief or Publisher.
- IRO Journals will not allow advertisements for contradictory items or services that are known to be hazardous for human population.
- Advertisements must be verifiable and not deceptive or misleading. Advertisements should clearly identify the advertiser as well as the product or service being promoted. Copy that is exaggerated or extravagantly written will not be permitted.
- IRO Journal will not permit any non-research related campaign to be targeted to a specific article(s) or on any page.
- All advertisements for ICT research-specific campaigns must promote proper and reasonable usage and must not be deceptive.
- Advertisements and editorial material must be distinguished properly. IRO journal does not publish “advertisement” content, and sponsored supplements must be explicitly labelled. If a supplement did not go through peer review or went through a different peer review procedure than the remainder of the journal, it should be mentioned explicitly.
- Editorial choices will not be affected by existing or future sponsors and advertisers, nor will marketing decisions be impacted. Advertisers and sponsors have no control or influence over the results of keyword or search topic conducted by users on the website.
- When you visit our website, we work with third-party advertising firms to show adverts and/or gather certain information. These companies may use cookies or web beacons to collect non-personally identifiable information [not including your name, address, email address, or telephone number] during your visit to this website in order to assist in displaying the advertisements on other websites that are also likely to be of interest to you.
Policy for Advertising Complaints
Please direct any advertising-related concerns to: contact@iroglobal.com
Advertising Standards Council of India
The Advertising Standards Council of India (ASCI), established in 1985, is a self-regulatory voluntary organization of the advertising industry in India. It is a non-Government body. ASCI is committed to the cause of self-regulation in advertising, ensuring the protection of the interest of consumers. ASCI seeks to ensure that advertisements conform to its Code for Self-Regulation, which requires advertisements to be legal, decent, honest and truthful, and not hazardous or harmful while observing fairness in competition. ASCI looks into complaints across ALL MEDIA such as Print, TV, Radio, hoardings, SMS, Emailers, Internet/website, product packaging, brochures, promotional material and point of sale material etc.
Revenue Sources
IRO journals is self-funded. It is not backed by any government or agency. Currently, subscription is the only source of revenue. The subscription resource covers the operating expenses such as web presence, online version, pre-press preparations, and staff wages.
The journal subscription is not mandatory for article processing and publication.
The subscriber receives the publication updates on the articles after every issue.
Subscription FormDirect Marketing
The journal has started a range of direct marketing activities, including direct sales, telemarketing, database marketing, direct transaction and generating direct response to adverts via direct mail and different broadcasts and website. These activities help the journal to develop long-term relations with the clients.
The primary direct marketing activities are:
- Catalogue Marketing
- Email Marketing
- Digital Marketing [Websites, Social Media presence]
Ethical Statement
IRO Journals adheres to COPE's guidelines on authorship https://publicationethics.org/authorship
- All authors must have implicit and explicit consent for the submitted research article.
- Implicit consent: Agreement on the content by all authors before submission.
- Explicit consent: Approval from institutions where the research was conducted, if applicable.
- All authors should have made substantial contributions to the research (e.g., data analysis, interpretation, software development, results, and analysis).
- Authors are expected to revise the manuscript to improve its scholarly content and approve the final version before publication.
- They are also responsible for the published work's integrity and data accuracy.
- All authors must approve the final manuscript content and its submission for publication.
- Corresponding authors are responsible for ensuring that all co-authors are included and their contributions acknowledged.
If adjustments to author order or listing are necessary, written communication signed by all authors is required. This document should state that all authors are informed and agree to the change. Upon receiving this signed document, the changes will be updated. The journal will subsequently publish a correction notice outlining the change and update the official version of record.
COPE offers guidance for editors and reviewers on identifying potential authorship issues or manipulation within manuscripts https://publicationethics.org/
All authors are required to list their affiliation as either the institution where the research was conducted or their current institutional affiliation. If you suspect potential affiliation manipulation, please contact the journal's Editor or the publisher at journals@iroglobal.com
IRO Journals, in accordance with COPE https://publicationethics.org/
Research must follow ethical guidelines for studies involving humans and animals.
Informed Consent: Human participants must provide informed consent and have their privacy protected.
Animal Welfare: Animal research must be conducted humanely and follow relevant guidelines.
Transparency: Authors must disclose funding sources and any potential conflicts of interest.
Rigorous Review: IRO Journals reviews manuscripts carefully to ensure ethical research practices.
IRO Journals reserves the right to reject any manuscript based on concerns about the ethical conduct of human or animal research.