Journal of ISMAC
IRO Journals
Volume 4 — Issue 1 — March 2022

Detection of White Blood Cell Cancer using Deep Learning using Cmyk-Moment Localisation for Information Retrieval

https://doi.org/10.36548/jismac.2022.1.006
Pages: 54-72
PDF
M. Muthumanjula
PG Scholar, SRM TRP Engineering College
Ramasubramanian Bhoopalan
Professor, Department of ECE, SRM TRP Engineering College
PDF

How to Cite

Muthumanjula, M., and Ramasubramanian Bhoopalan. 2022. “Detection of White Blood Cell Cancer Using Deep Learning Using Cmyk-Moment Localisation for Information Retrieval”. Journal of ISMAC 4 (1): 54-72. https://doi.org/10.36548/jismac.2022.1.006.
ACM ACS APA ABNT Chicago Harvard IEEE MLA Turabian Vancouver AMA

Download Citation

Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX

Keywords

— ALL
— AML
— CLL
— CML
— WBCC
— deep learning
— CNN
— ROI
Published: 16-05-2022

Abstract

Medical diagnosis, notably concerning tumors, has been transformed by artificial intelligence as well as deep neural network. White blood cell identification, in particular, necessitates effective diagnosis and therapy. White Blood Cell Cancer (WBCC) comes in a variety of forms. Acute Leukemia Lymphocytes (ALL), Acute Myeloma Lymphocytes (AML), Chronic Leukemia Lymphocytes (CLL), and Chronic Myeloma Lymphocytes (CML) are white blood cell cancers for which detection is time-consuming procedure, vulnerable to sentient as well as equipment blunders. Despite just a comprehensive review with a competent examiner, it can be hard to render a precise conclusive determination in some cases. Conversely, Computer-Aided Diagnosis (CAD) may assist in lessening the number of inaccuracies as well as duration spent in diagnosing WBCC. Though deep learning is widely regarded as the most advanced method for detecting WBCCs, the richness of the retrieved attributes employed in developing the pixel-wise categorization algorithms has a substantial relationship with the efficiency of WBCC identification. The investigation of the various phases of alterations related with WBC concentrations and characteristics is crucial to CAD. Leveraging image handling plus deep learning technologies, a novel fusion characteristic retrieval technique has been created in this research. The suggested approach is divided into two parts: 1) The CMYK-moment localization approach is applied to define the Region of Interest (ROI) and 2) A CNN dependent characteristic blend strategy is utilized to obtain deep learning characteristics. The relevance of the retrieved characteristics is assessed via a variety of categorization techniques. The suggested component collection approach versus different attributes retrieval techniques is tested with an exogenous resource. With all the predictors, the suggested methodology exhibits good effectiveness, adaptability, including consistency, exhibiting aggregate categorization accuracies of 97.57 percent and 96.41 percent, correspondingly, utilizing the main as well as auxiliary samples. This approach has provided a novel option for enhancing CLL identification that may result towards a more accurate identification of malignancies.

References

  1. K. AL-Dulaimi, J. Banks, K. Nugyen, A. Al-Sabaawi, I. Tomeo-Reyes, and V. Chandran, ‘‘Segmentation of white blood cell, nucleus and cytoplasm in digital haematology microscope images: A Review–challenges, current and future potential techniques,’’ IEEE Rev. Biomed. Eng., vol. 14, pp. 290–306, 2021.
  2. L. Bigorra, A. Merino, S. Alférez, and J. Rodellar, ‘‘Feature analysis and automatic identification of leukemic lineage blast cells and reactive lymphoid cells from peripheral blood cell images,’’ J. Clin. Lab. Anal., vol. 31, no. 2, Mar. 2017, Art. no. e22024.
  3. Y. Liu and F. Long, ‘‘Acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells image analysis with deep bagging ensemble learning,’’ in CNMC Challenge: Classification in Cancer Cell Imaging. Singapore: Springer, 2019, pp. 113–121
  4. J. W. Choi, Y. Ku, B. W. Yoo, J.-A. Kim, D. S. Lee, Y. J. Chai, H.-J. Kong, and H. C. Kim, ‘‘White blood cell differential count of maturation stages in bone marrow smear using dual-stage convolutional neural networks,’’ PLoS ONE, vol. 12, no. 12, Dec. 2017, Art. no. e0189259.
  5. N. Baghel, U. Verma, and K. K. Nagwanshi, ‘‘WBCs-Net: Type identification of white blood cells using convolutional neural network,’’ Multimedia Tools Appl., vol. 162, pp. 1–17, Sep. 2021.
  6. R. M. Roy and A. P. M., ‘‘Segmentation of leukocyte by semantic segmentation model: A deep learning approach,’’ Biomed. Signal Process. Control, vol. 65, Mar. 2021, Art. no. 102385.
  7. K. A. K. Al-Dulaimi, J. Banks, V. Chandran, I. Tomeo-Reyes, and K. N. Thanh, ‘‘Classification of white blood cell types from microscope images: Techniques and challenges,’’ Tech. Rep., 2018.
  8. P. Pandey, S. Pallavi, and S. C. Pandey, ‘‘Pragmatic medical image analysis and deep learning: An emerging trend,’’ in Advancement of Machine Intelligence in Interactive Medical Image Analysis. Singapore: Springer, Jan. 2020, pp. 1–18.[Online]. Available: http://www.springer.com/series/16171, doi: 10.1007/978-981-15- 1100-4_1.
  9. S. Asgari Taghanaki, K. Abhishek, J. P. Cohen, J. Cohen-Adad, and G. Hamarneh, ‘‘Deep semantic segmentation of natural and medical images: A review,’’ Artif. Intell. Rev., vol. 4, pp. 1–42, Jun. 2020.
  10. Rakhmadi, ‘‘Connected component labeling using components neighborsscan labeling approach,’’ J. Comput. Sci., vol. 6, no. 10, pp. 1099–1107, Oct. 2010
  11. R. I. Agustin, A. Arif, and U. Sukorini, ‘‘Classification of immature white blood cells in acute lymphoblastic leukemia l1 using neural networks particle swarm optimization,’’ Neural Comput. Appl., vol. 33, no. 17, pp. 10869–10880, Sep. 2021.
  12. S. H. Shirazi, A. I. Umar, N. Haq, S. Naz, M. I. Razzak, and A. Zaib, ‘‘Extreme learning machine based microscopic red blood cells classification,’’ Cluster Comput., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 691–701, Mar. 2018.
  13. F. Cao, M. Cai, J. Chu, J. Zhao, and Z. Zhou, ‘‘A novel segmentation algorithm for nucleus in white blood cells based on low-rank representation,’’ Neural Comput. Appl., vol. 28, no. S1, pp. 503–511, Dec. 2017
  14. D. López-Puigdollers, V. Javier Traver, and F. Pla, ‘‘Recognizing white blood cells with local image descriptors,’’ Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 115, pp. 695–708, Jan. 2019.
  15. H. A. Elsalamony, ‘‘Detection of anaemia disease in human red blood cells using cell signature, neural networks and SVM,’’ Multimedia Tools Appl., vol. 77, no. 12, pp. 15047–15074, 2018.
  16. M. A. Parab and N. D. Mehendale, ‘‘Red blood cell classification using image processing and CNN,’’ Social Netw. Comput. Sci., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 1–10, Apr. 2021.
  17. D. T. Nguyen, T. D. Pham, N. R. Baek, and K. R. Park, ‘‘Combining deep and handcrafted image features for presentation attack detection in face recognition systems using visible-light camera sensors,’’ Sensors, vol. 18, no. 3, p. 699, Feb. 2018.
  18. T. Pansombut, S. Wikaisuksakul, K. Khongkraphan, and A. Phon-on, ‘‘Convolutional neural networks for recognition of lymphoblast cell images,’’ Comput. Intell. Neurosci., vol. 2019, pp. 1–12, Jun. 2019
  19. Y. Lu, X. Qin, H. Fan, T. Lai, and Z. Li, ‘‘WBC-Net: A white blood cell segmentation network based on UNet++ and Resnet,’’ Appl. Soft Comput., vol. 101, Mar. 2021, Art. no. 107006.
  20. A. Abdurrazzaq, A. K. Junoh, Z. Yahya, and I. Mohd, ‘‘New white blood cell detection technique by using singular value decomposition concept,’’ Multimedia Tools Appl., vol. 80, no. 3, pp. 4627–4638, Jan. 2021.
  21. N. Khomairoh, R. Sigit, T. Harsono, Y. Hernaningsih, and A. Anwar, ‘‘Segmentation system of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) subtypes on microscopic blood smear image,’’ in Proc. Int. Electron. Symp. (IES), Sep. 2020, pp. 565–570.
  22. R. B. Hegde, K. Prasad, H. Hebbar, and B. M. K. Singh, ‘‘Feature extraction using traditional image processing and convolutional neural network methods to classify white blood cells: A study,’’ Australas. Phys. Eng. Sci. Med., vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 627–638, Jun. 2019
  23. S. Saleem, J. Amin, M. Sharif, M. A. Anjum, M. Iqbal, and S.-H. Wang, ‘‘A deep network designed for segmentation and classification of leukemia using fusion of the transfer learning models,’’ Complex Intell. Syst., Jul. 2021.
  24. V. J. Ramya and S. Lakshmi, ‘‘Acute myelogenous leukemia detection using optimal neural network based on fractional black-widow model,’’ Signal, Image Video Process., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 229–238, Feb. 2022
  25. A. E. Rad, M. S. M. Rahim, H. Kolivand, and I. B. M. Amin, ‘‘Morphological region-based initial contour algorithm for level set methods in image segmentation,’’ Multimedia Tools Appl., vol. 76, no. 2, pp. 2185–2201, Jan. 2017.
  26. C. D. Ruberto, A. Loddo, and L. Putzu. ‘‘A multiple classifier learning by sampling system for white blood cells segmentation,’’ in Computer Analysis of Images and Patterns. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2015.
  27. C. Di Ruberto, A. Loddo, and L. Putzu, ‘‘A leucocytes count system from blood smear images,’’ Mach. Vis. Appl., vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 1151–1160, 2016.
  28. Orlov, Nikita & Chen, Wayne & Eckley, David & Macura, Tomasz & Shamir, Lior & Jaffe, Elaine & Goldberg, Ilya. (2010). Automatic Classification of Lymphoma Images With Transform-Based Global Features. IEEE transactions on information technology in biomedicine : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. 14. 1003-13. 10.1109/TITB.2010.2050695.
  29. A. Acevedo, A. Merino, S. Alférez, Á. Molina, L. Boldú, and J. Rodellar, ‘‘A dataset of microscopic peripheral blood cell images for development of automatic recognition systems,’’ Data Brief, vol. 30, Jun. 2020, Art. no. 105474.
  30. V. Andrearczyk and P. F. Whelan, ‘‘Chapter 4—Deep learning in texture analysis and its application to tissue image classification, in Biomedical Texture Analysis, A. Depeursinge, O. S. Al-Kadi, and J.R. Mitchell, Eds. New York, NY, USA: Academic, 2017, pp. 95–129.
  31. A. Zhang, ‘‘Chapter 6: Convolutional neural networks, section 6.4: Multiple input and multiple output channels,’’ in Dive into Deep Learning. 2021.
  32. C. Karabag, J. Verhoeven, N. R. Miller, and C. C. Reyes-Aldasoro, ‘‘Tex- ˇ ture segmentation: An objective comparison between five traditional algorithms and a deep-learning U-Net architecture,’’ Appl. Sci., vol. 9, no. 18, p. 3900, Sep. 2019.
  33. N. Srivastava, G. Hinton, A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever, and R. Salakhutdinov, ‘‘Dropout: A simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting,’’ J. Mach. Learn. Res., vol. 15, no. 56, pp. 1929–1958, 2014.
  34. F. Rosenblatt, ‘‘Principles of neurodynamics. Perceptrons and the theory of brain mechanisms,’’ Cornell Aeronautical Lab Inc, Buffalo, NY, USA, Tech. Rep., 1961.
  35. L. Breiman, ‘‘Random forests,’’ Mach. Learn., vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 5–32, 2001
  36. C. Cortes and V. Vapnik, ‘‘Support-vector networks,’’ Mach. Learn., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 273–297, 1995.
  37. T. Chen and C. Guestrin, ‘‘XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system,’’ in Proc. 22nd ACM SIGKDD Int. Conf. Knowl. Discovery Data Mining, Aug. 2016, pp. 785–794.
  38. H. Rezatofighi, N. Tsoi, J. Gwak, A. Sadeghian, I. Reid, and S. Savarese, ‘‘Generalized intersection over union: A metric and a loss for bounding box regression,’’ in Proc. IEEE/CVF Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit. (CVPR), Jun. 2019, pp. 658–666.
  39. M. Hossin and M. N. Sulaiman, ‘‘A review on evaluation metrics for data classification evaluations,’’ Int. J. Data Mining Knowl. Manage. Process, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 1–11, Mar. 2015.
  40. O. O. Koyejo, N. Natarajan, P. K. Ravikumar, and I. S. Dhillon, ‘‘Consistent binary classification with generalized performance metrics,’’ in Proc. NIPS, 2014, pp. 1–9.