Reservoir Water Level Prediction and Gate Operation Optimization Using Machine Learning: A Case Study of Shetrunji Reservoir, Gujarat
view PDF
view PDF

How to Cite

Pandit, Purnima, Isha Jain, Narendra Shrimali, Gargi Trivedi, and Roshani Chauhan. 2026. “Reservoir Water Level Prediction and Gate Operation Optimization Using Machine Learning: A Case Study of Shetrunji Reservoir, Gujarat”. Recent Research Reviews Journal 5 (2): 407-25. https://doi.org/10.36548/rrrj.2026.2.010.

Keywords

Reservoir Operation
Machine Learning
Water Level Forecasting
Gate Control
Flood Mitigation
XGBoost

Abstract

Control over reservoir water levels and gate settings at the spillways is key for preventing floods, protecting people living downstream, and efficient utilization of stored water especially when the reservoir is nearing its maximum capacity. This research project centers on the Shetrunji Reservoir in Gujarat, India, investigating the potential of machine learning to improve operations. Daily and event-based hydrological records for the reservoir covering the period 2020 to 2024 were compiled, digitized, and used to train and test predictive models. Precipitation behaviour, inflow characteristics, and the existing operating protocol were analysed, and three modelling frameworks were developed: computational automation of the current lookup-based practice; an Intermediate Machine Learning scheme that combines Quadratic Regression for the level-storage relationship with K-Nearest Neighbours regression for the gauge-discharge relationship; and an XGBoost regression model for direct water-level forecasting. On the held-out test partition, which comprises 20 percent of the observations, the Quadratic Regression model reproduced the level-storage curve with a coefficient of determination of 0.9999, the K-Nearest Neighbours model reproduced the gauge-discharge curve with a coefficient of determination of 0.9995, and the XGBoost model forecast the reservoir water level with a root mean squared error of 0.0419 m, a coefficient of determination of 0.9995, and a mean squared error of 0.00175. These accuracies are interpreted in the light of the smooth, near-deterministic nature of the underlying rating relationships. A tiered gate-operation rule is proposed that extends the simple full-reservoir-level threshold by incorporating water-level bands, gate-sequencing priority, and structural safety considerations. The results indicate that data-driven models can support proactive flood-risk reduction and more consistent, timely gate operation, contributing to safer and more resilient reservoir management.

References

  1. Houghton, John T. “The Global Climate.” In Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001: 1–98.
  2. Gleick, Peter H. “Water in Crisis: Paths to Sustainable Water Use.” Ecological Applications 1998, vol. 8, no. 3, 571–579.
  3. Mall, R. K., Akhilesh Gupta, Ranjeet Singh, and R. S. Singh. “Water Resources and Climate Change: An Indian Perspective.” Current Science, 20026, vol. 90, no. 12, 1610–1626.
  4. Kumar, K. Rupa, G. B. Pant, B. Parthasarathy, and N. A. Sontakke. “Spatial and Subseasonal Patterns of the Long-Term Trends of Indian Summer Monsoon Rainfall.” International Journal of Climatology, 1992, vol. 12, no. 3, 257–268.
  5. UNESCO. The United Nations World Water Development Report 2020: Water and Climate Change. Paris: UNESCO, 2020: 1–219.
  6. Mekonnen, Mesfin M., and Arjen Y. Hoekstra. “Four Billion People Facing Severe Water Scarcity.” Science Advances, 2016, vol. 2, no. 2, 1–6.
  7. Hoekstra, Arjen Y., and Mesfin M. Mekonnen. “The Water Footprint of Humanity.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2012, vol. 109, no. 9, 3232–3237.
  8. Vörösmarty, Charles J., Peter B. McIntyre, Mark O. Gessner, David Dudgeon, Alexander Prusevich, Pamela Green, and Stanley Glidden. “Global Threats to Human Water Security and River Biodiversity.” Nature, 2010, vol. 467, no. 7315, 555–561.
  9. IPCC. Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014: 1–32.
  10. Tian, Hao. “Cascade Dams and River Ecosystem Health.” Journal of Hydrology, 2021, 598, 1–12.
  11. Richter, Brian D., Ruth Mathews, David L. Harrison, and Robert Wigington. “Ecologically Sustainable Water Management.” Environmental Management, 2008, vol. 42, no. 1, 111–120.
  12. Bhatt, Sanjay U., Vipul K. Shinglot, Manthan R. Tiwari, and Narendra J. Shrimali. “Application of Soft Computing Techniques to Predict Reservoir Water Level.” International Journal of Advanced Engineering Research and Studies, 2016, vol. 5, no. 3, 45–49.
  13. Meema, Thanaporn, Yasuto Tachikawa, Yutaka Ichikawa, and Kazuaki Yorozu. “Real-Time Optimization of a Large-Scale Reservoir Operation in Thailand Using Adaptive Inflow Prediction with Medium-Range Ensemble Precipitation Forecasts.” Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 2021, vol. 38, 1–20.
  14. Yu, Xiang, Yue-Ping Xu, Hui Gu, and Yuxue Guo. “Multi-Objective Robust Optimization of Reservoir Operation for Real-Time Flood Control under Forecasting Uncertainty.” Journal of Hydrology, 2023, vol. 620, 1–16.
  15. Rezay Nazarzadeh, Mohammad, Ali Mohammad AkhondAli, and Alireza Daneshkhah. “Optimization of Reservoir Operation for Real-Time Flood Control with Emphasis on Forecast Uncertainty: A Case Study of Dez Reservoir.” Journal of Hydraulic Structures, 2020, vol. 6, no. 3, 92–107.
  16. Chang, Li-Chiu, Fi-John Chang, Kai-Wei Wang, and Shin-Yi Dai. “Constrained Genetic Algorithms for Optimizing Multi-Use Reservoir Operation.” Journal of Hydrology, 2010, vol. 390, no. 1–2, 66–74.
  17. Malekmohammadi, Bahram, Banafsheh Zahraie, and Reza Kerachian. “A Real-Time Operation Optimization Model for Flood Management in River-Reservoir Systems.” Natural Hazards, 2010, vol. 53, no. 3, 459–482.
  18. Russell, S. Ollie, and Paul F. Campbell. “Reservoir Operating Rules with Fuzzy Programming.” Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 1996, vol. 122, no. 3, 165–170.
  19. Kumar, Vijendra, and S. M. Yadav. “Optimization of Reservoir Operation with a New Approach in Evolutionary Computation Using TLBO Algorithm and Jaya Algorithm.” Water Resources Management, 2018, vol. 32, no. 13, 4375–4391.
  20. Al-Nouti, Abdulaziz F., Miao Fu, and Neeraj Dhanraj Bokde. “Reservoir Operation Based Machine Learning Models: Comprehensive Review for Limitations, Research Gap, and Possible Future Research Direction.” Knowledge-Based Engineering and Sciences, 2024, vol. 5, no. 2, 75–139.
  21. Thomas, T., N. C. Ghosh, and K. P. Sudheer. “Optimal Reservoir Operation: A Climate Change Adaptation Strategy for Narmada Basin in Central India.” Journal of Hydrology, 2021, vol. 598, 1–15.
  22. Anandharuban, Prabaharan, Michele La Rocca, and Lakshmanan Elango. “A Box-Model Approach for Reservoir Operation during Extreme Rainfall Events: A Case Study.” Journal of Earth System Science, 2019, vol. 128, no. 8, 1–13.
  23. Ahmed, Jahangir A., and Arup K. Sarma. “Genetic Algorithm for Optimal Operating Policy of a Multipurpose Reservoir.” Water Resources Management, 2004, vol. 18, no. 1, 1–18.
  24. Dal, Pravin, and Anil Vaghela. “Preliminary Survey of Avifaunal Diversity around Shetrunji River, Dhari, India.” Journal of Biology and Earth Sciences, 2015, vol. 5, no. 1, 19–24.
  25. Government of Gujarat. Water Resources Department Report. Gandhinagar: Narmada Water Resources, Water Supply and Kalpsar Department, 2010: 1–45.