Abstract
This study presents a hybrid robotics automation system that optimizes real-time navigation, obstacle avoidance, and environmental mapping under difficult situations by combining AutoNav, LIDAR-based SLAM, and DenseNet with Leaky ReLU for robust motion planning. The main goals are to use AutoNav to enable autonomous navigation with optimal path planning, LIDAR-based SLAM to accomplish precise mapping and localization, and DenseNet and Leaky ReLU to improve motion planning and obstacle avoidance. Through the integration of various technologies, the study suggests an effective and flexible system for robotic operations in dynamic situations in real time. In order to provide the best trajectory planning and accurate obstacle recognition, the system constantly modifies motion planning based on real-time sensor data. Performance results show that the system outperforms individual parts, with a 95% gradient efficiency, a localization error of only 0.045 meters, and a pathfinding accuracy of 97.5%, the system's performance results illustrate its superiority over individual parts and highlight its real-time adaptability and optimization accuracy. For the future of robotics, this hybrid system offers breakthroughs in real-time decision-making and nimble autonomous robotic navigation.
References
Blacker, Peter Charles. "Optimal Use of Machine Learning for Planetary Terrain Navigation." PhD diss., University of Surrey, 2021. https://openresearch.surrey.ac.uk/esploro/outputs/doctoral/Optimal-Use-of-Machine-Learning-for/99613165802346
Gudivaka, R. L. (2023). AI-driven optimization in robotic process automation: Implementing neural networks for real-time imperfection prediction. International Journal of Business and General Management (IJBGM), 12(1), 35–46.
Moreno, Marina Aguilar. "Contributions to LiDAR based SLAM and Computational Ethology." PhD diss., Universidad del País Vasco-Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea, 2023.https://www.ehu.eus/ccwintco/uploads/b/be/Presentacion_tesis_Marina_Aguilar.pdf
Gudivaka, R. (2023). Transforming business operations: The role of artificial intelligence in robotic process automation. IMPACT: International Journal of Research in Business Management, 11(9), 35–48.
Saleem, H., Malekian, R., & Munir, H. (2023). Neural network-based recent research developments in SLAM for autonomous ground vehicles: A review. IEEE Sensors Journal, 23(13), 13829-13858.
Gudivaka, R. L. (2020). Robotic process automation meets cloud computing: A framework for automated scheduling in social robots. IMPACT: International Journal of Research in Business Management (IMPACT: IJRBM), 8(4), 49–62.
Brune, M., Meisen, T., & Pomp, A. (2024). Survey of Deep Learning-Based Methods for FMCW Radar Odometry and Ego-Localization. Applied Sciences, 14(6), 2267.
Gudivaka, B. R. (2024). Leveraging PCA, LASSO, and ESSANN for advanced robotic process automation and IoT systems. International Journal of Engineering & Science Research, 14(3), 718-731.
Hu, K., Chen, Z., Kang, H., & Tang, Y. (2024). 3D vision technologies for a self-developed structural external crack damage recognition robot. Automation in Construction, 159, 105262.
Basani, D. K. R. (2024). Robotic Process Automation in IoT: Enhancing Object Localization Using YOLOv3-Based Class Algorithms. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Creative Engineering, 12(3), 912–927.
Swain, N. R., Kulkarni, A. J., Sonawwanay, P. D., Babu, A., & Kale, J. G. (2024). Machine Learning Algorithms for Autonomous Vehicles. In Handbook of Formal Optimization (pp. 1-54). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.
Feng, B., Jiang, X., & Bi, Y. (2023, October). A Robot Motion Planning Approach Based on Adaptive Multi-Tree Sampling. In ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition (Vol. 87608, p. V003T03A065). American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
Basani, D. K. R. (2021). Leveraging Robotic Process Automation and Business Analytics in Digital Transformation: Insights from Machine Learning and AI. International Journal of Engineering Research & Science & Technology, 17(3), 115-133.
Khotsianivskyi, V., & Sineglazov, V. (2023). Robotic manipulator motion planning method development using neural network-based intelligent system. Machinery & Energetics, 14(4).
Gudivaka, R. K. (2020). Robotic process automation optimization in cloud computing via Two-Tier MAC and Lyapunov techniques. International Journal of Business and General Management (IJBGM), 9(5), 75–92.
Chettibi, T. (2024). Multi-objective trajectory planning for industrial robots using a hybrid optimization approach. Robotica, 1-20.
Basani, D. K. R. (2023). Robotic process automation meets advanced authentication: Utilizing PIN codes, biometric verification, and AI models. International Journal of Engineering & Science Research, 13(3), 152-165.
Liu, S., & Liu, P. (2022). Benchmarking and optimization of robot motion planning with motion planning pipeline. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 118(3), 949-961.
Song, X., Gao, H., Ding, T., Gu, Y., Liu, J., & Tian, K. (2023). A Review of the Motion Planning and Control Methods for Automated Vehicles. Sensors, 23(13), 6140.
Suresh, K. S., Venkatesan, R., & Venugopal, S. (2022). Mobile robot path planning using multi-objective genetic algorithm in industrial automation. Soft Computing, 26(15), 7387-7400.
Dong, L., He, Z., Song, C., & Sun, C. (2023). A review of mobile robot motion planning methods: from classical motion planning workflows to reinforcement learning-based architectures. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 34(2), 439-459.
Zhang, J., Liu, M., Zhang, S., Zheng, R., & Dong, S. (2022). Multi-AUV adaptive path planning and cooperative sampling for ocean scalar field estimation. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 71, 1-14.
Bai, C., Zhang, J., Guo, J., & Yue, C. P. (2023). Adaptive Hybrid Optimization Learning-Based Accurate Motion Planning of Multi-Joint Arm. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 34(9), 5440-5451.