Energy-Efficient Neuromorphic Architectures Enabled by Resistive Memory
PDF

Keywords

Static Random CMOS Access Memories (SRAMs)
Non-Volatile CMOS SRAM (NVCSRAM)
OXRAM
Power Dissipation
Technology

How to Cite

Sharma, Joshika, and Shyam Akashe. 2025. “Energy-Efficient Neuromorphic Architectures Enabled by Resistive Memory”. Journal of Trends in Computer Science and Smart Technology 7 (4): 622-40. https://doi.org/10.36548/jtcsst.2025.4.001.

Abstract

Their excellent performance and compatibility with CMOS technology, while the OXRAM (Oxide-based CMOS Resistive Random Access Memory) technique used in CMOS transistors presents challenges in terms of device unpredictability and scalability, also offers potential advantages such as higher endurance, lower power consumption, and quicker reading and writing operation speeds when compared to traditional Flash memory. The inability of conventional SRAMs to store data after powering off limits their use in battery-operated mobile devices and other applications where non-volatility related to zero leakage currents is required. In the article, a new OXRAM-based Non-Volatile SRAM (NVSRAM) device is presented. It is suggested to compare the performance of SRAM with NVSRAM at the memory and cell levels. Learning is crucial for the brain's ability to adapt to changing conditions. A synaptic connection table in an external memory at a local routing node is used to learn a rule in the address domain for neuromorphic architecture. A number of parameters are compared, including design complexity, leakage current values (SRAM cells are 3.4µA, 7.4nA) and (NVSRAM-based OXRAM are 2.7 µA, 5.9nA) at 180nm and 90nm, and energy saving or power usage values (SRAM cells cell are 5.5 µA, 10.5nA) and (NVSRAM based OXRAM are 4.9 µA, 9.8nA) at 180nm and 90nm. The circuits that are being described can be realized using far-above ground voltage CMOS Cadence tools at 180 nm and 90 nm.

PDF

References

Morsali, Mehrdad, Brendan Reidy, Deniz Najafi, Sepehr Tabrizchi, Mohsen Imani, Mahdi Nikdast, Arman Roohi, Ramtin Zand, and Shaahin Angizi. "Lightator: An optical near-sensor accelerator with compressive acquisition enabling versatile image processing." In Proceedings of the 61st ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference, 2024, 1-6.

Morsali, Mehrdad, Sepehr Tabrizchi, Deniz Najafi, Mohsen Imani, Mahdi Nikdast, Arman Roohi, and Shaahin Angizi. "OISA: Architecting an optical in-sensor accelerator for efficient visual computing." In 2024 Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition (DATE), IEEE, 2024, 1-6.

R. Nagulapalli, R. K. Palani, and S. A. Bhagavatula.“24.4 ppm/°C voltage mode bandgap reference with a 1.05 V supply”. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II, Exp. Briefs, no. 68 (2021).

J. Wang, H. An, Q. Zhang, H. S. Kim, D. Blaauw, and D. Sylvester. “A 40-nm ultra-low leakage voltage-stacked SRAM for intelligent IoT sensors”. IEEE Solid-State Circuits Lett., no. 04 ( 2021).

R. G. B. Sangalang, S. Reddy, L. K. S. Tolentino, Y. W. Shen, O. L. J. A. Jose, and C. C. Wang. “A 210-MHz 4.23 fJ/bit 1-kb asymmetrical Schmitt-trigger-based SRAM using 40-nm CMOS process”. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II, Exp. Briefs, no. 70 (2023).

Y. Kuang, X. Cui, Y. Zhong, K. Liu, C. Zou, Z. Dai, et al., “A 64K-neuron 64M-1b-synapse 2.64 pJ/SOP neuromorphic chip with all memory on chip for spike-based models in 65 nm CMOS”. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II, Exp. Briefs, no. 68 (2021): 2655–2659.

J. Pu, W. L. Goh, V. P. Nambiar, M. M. Wong, A. T.Do, and A. T. Do. “A 5.28-mm² 4.5-pJ/SOP energy-efficient spiking neural network hardware with reconfigurable high processing speed neuron core and congestion-aware router”. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I, Reg. Papers, no. 68 (2021): 5081–5094.

T.-M. Tsai, et al., “An oxygen vacancy mediated Ag reduction and nucleation mechanism in SiO₂ RRAM devices”. J. Alloys Compd., no. 826 (2020): 154-126.

C. Frenkel, D. Bol, and G. Indiveri, “Bottom-up and top-down approaches for the design of neuromorphic processing systems: Tradeoffs and synergies between natural and artificial intelligence”. Proc. IEEE, no. 111, no. 6 (2023): 623–652.

S. Liu and Y. Yi. “Knowledge distillation between DNN and SNN for intelligent sensing systems on Loihi chip”. in Proc. 24th Int. Symp. Quality Electronic Design (ISQED), (2023): 1–8.

H. Bazzi, A. Harb, H. Aziza, M. Moreau, and A. Kassem. “RRAM-based non-volatile SRAM cell architectures for ultra-low-power applications”. Analog Integr. Circuits Signal Process., no. 106 (2020): 351–361.

J. Yin, W. Liao, Y. Zhang, J. Jiang, and C. Chen.“An 8 kb RRAM-based nonvolatile SRAM with pre-decoding and fast storage/restoration time”. Appl. Sci., no. 13(2023): 531.

Z. Yang, Z. Han, Y. Huang, and T. T.-T.Ye, “55 nm CMOS analog circuit implementation of LIF and STDP functions for low-power SNNs”. in Proc. IEEE/ACM Int. Symp.Low Power Electron. Design (ISLPED), Boston, MA, USA, (2021): 1–6.

G. Indiveri, F. Corradi, and N. Qiao, “Neuromorphic architectures for spiking deep neural networks”. in Proc. IEEE Int. Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM), Washington, DC, USA, (2015) : 4.2.1–4.2.4.

P. U. Jain and V. K. Tomar. “Ultra-low power 9T FinFET based SRAM cell for IoT applications”. J. Electr. Syst., no. 20, (2024):2755–2770.